Language Policy Research Unit (LPRU)
LPRU Home | About LPRU | Advisory Board | LPRUNEWS Listserv | Forums | SCEED Home

Resources
Journal of Language, Identity, and Education
Policy Briefs
Demographic Data
Bibliography
Virtual Library
Book Notes
Legal Resources
Media Resources
Scholarly Journals
Internet Resources


LPRU Language Policy Forum

Language Policy in the Unz States:
A Focus on California, Arizona, Massachusetts, & Colorado


National Association for Bilingual Education (NABE) 2003
The 32nd Annual International Bilingual Multicultural Education Conference
New Orleans, LA, January 29—February 1, 2003

This session was organized by the Language Policy SIG of the
National Association for Bilingual Education, with support from LPRU.

This virtual forum provides a synopsis and streaming audio and video of each of the presentations. Presentations are approximately 20 minutes in length. Windows Media Player is required for listening or viewing.
Chairs:
Kate Menken
NABE Language Policy SIG Chair
Columbia Teachers College
Wayne E. Wright
NABE Language Policy SIG Vice Chair
Arizona State University

Panel Description
Unz’santi-bilingual education language policies were recently passed into law in California, Arizona and Massachusetts, but failed to pass in Colorado. An expert panel representing each state explores this pressing issue from educational, legal, political, ideological, and personal perspectives to better understand its implications and share the important lessons learned in these states.

    Panel Members
  • Patricia Loera
    National Association for Bilingual Education (NABE)
  • Kathy Escamilla
    University of Colorado at Boulder
  • Eugene Garcia
    Arizona State University
  • Josué González
    Arizona State University
  • Roger Rice
    Multicultural Education, Training and Advocacy (META) Associates, MA

Welcome and Opening Remarks


Kate Menken
Columbia Teachers College


Wayne E. Wright
Arizona State University

Video
Windows Media Broadband
Windows Media 56k
Audio Only
Windows Media—56k or higher
Windows Media—28k

The National Scene
Impact of Ballot Initiatives on NABE and English Language Learners

Patricia Loera
National Association for Bilingual Education (NABE)

Synopsis: Patricia Loera, NABE’s Legislative Analysis, describes NABE’s efforts at the national level to protect services for English language learning students. NABE’s efforts fall into three categories: (1) ESEA Reauthorization, (2) Appropriations, and (3) Implementation of Laws and Regulations. In the ESEA Reauthorization, NABE was successful in blocking efforts to restrict L1 instruction or place time limits on bilingual programs. However, there were several other areas NABE was unsuccessful. In terms of appropriations for bilingual education NABE continues to advocate for more funding, but the recent initiatives have made this more challenging. In terms of Implementation of Law and Regulations, NABE is providing assistance to help states and districts with implementing No Child Left Behind, to make sure they fully understand the law as it applies to English language learning students.

Background on National Anti-Bilingual Education Movement

Video
Windows Media Broadband
Windows Media 56k
Audio Only
Windows Media—56k or higher
Windows Media—28k

Colorado—Amendment 31
The Defeat of Unz

Kathy Escamilla
University of Colorado at Boulder

Synopsis: Kathy Escamilla describes the success of defeating Question 31, the Unz initiative in Colorado. She attributes the success to strong grassroots support, the extra time gained by challenging the initial bill in court, a substantial gift from a parent of a student in a dual-immersion program, and developing a message that appealed to mainstream Colorado. Escamilla responds to some of the criticism regarding their approach, and provides advice for educators, parents, and community leaders in other states to protect equitable programs for ELL students.

A web version of Kathy Escamilla's PowerPoint presentation can be downloaded from this point.

Video
Windows Media Broadband
Windows Media 56k
Audio Only
Windows Media—56k or higher
Windows Media—28k

California—Proposition 227

Eugene Garcia
Arizona State University

Synopsis: Eugene Garcia discusses the aftermath of Proposition 227 in California. He describes research he and others conducted to document the response of individual school districts, schools, and teachers after the passage of Prop. 227. Garcia and his colleagues found that the response has varied greatly, and while many districts did end their bilingual programs, those districts and schools that were committed to their bilingual programs and had seen them succeed, continued their programs utilizing the waiver process.

See the special issue of the Bilingual Research Journal 24(1-2), on the Implementation of California's Proposition 227 (1998-2000) (guest edited by Eugene Garcia) for the articles referred to in this presentation.

Video
Windows Media Broadband
Windows Media 56k
Audio Only
Windows Media—56k or higher
Windows Media—28k

Arizona—Proposition 203
The Benefits of Unz

Josué González
Arizona State University

Synopsis: Josué González briefly describes the passage and effects of Proposition 203, the Unz initiative in Arizona. However, González then departs from this subject to contextualize the attack on bilingual education within the overarching issues of demographic change in the U.S. He argues that knee jerk reactions such as the Unz initiatives are out of sync with the currently reality of language diversity in the United States, and argues his initiatives will ultimately become irrelevant as the demographic shift continues. González concludes with an argument that there are actually several benefits of Unz initiatives.
Video
Windows Media Broadband
Windows Media 56k
Audio Only
Windows Media—56k or higher
Windows Media—28k

Massachusetts—Question 2

Roger Rice
Multicultural Education, Training and Advocacy (META) Associates

Synopsis: Roger Rice describes the efforts to defeat Question 2, the Unz initiative in Massachusetts. Rice draws several comparisons with the campaign which took place in Colorado at the same time, and argues that the main differences were the extra year Colorado was able to gain through the lawsuit, and most importantly, the large donation the campaign received from the mother of a student in a dual-immersion program. Rice also debunks the myth that the majority of Hispanics support Unz initiatives by showing election results by precincts revealing that areas with large Hispanic populations voted no on Question 2.
Video
Windows Media Broadband
Windows Media 56k
Audio Only
Windows Media—56k or higher
Windows Media—28k
 



Language Policy Research Unit - Mary Lou Fulton College of Education - Arizona State University
© Arizona Board of Regents (ABOR)